Code review comment for lp:~danilo/launchpad/bug-814580-cold-db

Revision history for this message
Данило Шеган (danilo) wrote :

Yes, it's only for the rename.

A view TranslationSharingJob mirroring PackagingJob is a great idea: that would then go into https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-814580-db/+merge/69979 instead of this branch. However, modifications are a bit more complicated (CREATE RULE ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE will have to be provided as well). Even with all that, I am not sure if storm will work with it properly.

The code change from this branch would then go into https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-814580/+merge/69978

And this branch could only drop the view and rename the table. Is that what you are suggesting?

« Back to merge proposal