Code review comment for lp:~dandrader/unity-api/lifecycle
Revision history for this message
| Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
> Why can't we just have the screenshot being obtained by an image provider? Why
> would Application save its screenshot internally at all? It was useful before
> QtComp, as it was a cacheing system that made sense at the time, but now I
> don't see the benefit at all.
I don't get your comment. That what is happening already. The image provider is just an API between C++ and QML so that QML can use an URL to refer to an QImage held in the C++ side.