Mir

Code review comment for lp:~dandrader/mir/switchingBundle_lp1270964

Revision history for this message
Alexandros Frantzis (afrantzis) wrote :

> > Since 0 is a valid value it may come up again when our global/local frameno
> > counts wrap around.
>
> that doesn't matter if last_consumed has been written - it is only the first
> frame number used that can trigger the failure.

The fine point here is that this is a potential problem for all new surfaces, since they may be created just after the count wraps around and therefore get 0 as their first frameno value.

« Back to merge proposal