Code review comment for lp:~cyphermox/ubuntu/natty/cnetworkmanager/lp677589

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote :

I'll respectfully disagree on some points:

 - target to Natty; I'm fine with applying this change (and I did), but it's not strictly required. It's also fairly common procedure to submit UNRELEASED changes for sponsoring, then the sponsor will use dch -t or whatnot to release/commit/upload.

 - entry format: I think this is to be left to the individual maintainers. There is no guideline or rule made for how a changelog entry should look, and for other networkmanager packages we've been routinely using the "previous" format (the one I initially had in changelog. That said, I don't feel strongly for either way, so I've updated it.

 - DEP-3 states: "When Subject is used, it is expected that the long description is outside of the structured fields." which is why I've added a short description on the Subject: line, and a long description outside of structured fields.

« Back to merge proposal