Thanks, that issue is already in the current code but in the default case you end up calling "device->connect(connMode)" or "m_devices.addConnectAfterPairing(address, connMode)" on an un-initialized "connMode", isn't that an issue?
« Back to merge proposal
Thanks, that issue is already in the current code but in the default case you end up calling "device- >connect( connMode) " or "m_devices. addConnectAfter Pairing( address, connMode)" on an un-initialized "connMode", isn't that an issue?