Code review comment for lp:~cprov/uci-engine/charm-tests

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:52:38PM -0000, Celso Providelo wrote:
> Evan and Francis,
>
> I have no arguments against your proposal for spawning `make check` on charms as a clean transition to move them away from our tree.
>
> It is certainly a good ending-point to this polarised discussion full of hypothetical problems and no concrete solutions.
>
> Any arguments against running charms tests in called_by_tarmac.py before deploying the new environment ? (users would chdir into charms and run `make check`)

I am strongly against changing our charms to make them work with
uci-engine. I am also strongly in favor of getting our charms out of
our uci-engine branch. I don't think tracking several branches for MPs
is too much effort.

I am in support of running charm tests in isolation until they can be
put into separate branches.

Joe