I think we can probably use http_proxy instead. I'll give that a shot. Thanks for the comment!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:32 PM, James Troup <email address hidden> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to use $http_proxy (sic) rather than a > custom/Amulet specific variable name? $http_proxy is the de facto standard > environment variable name. > -- > > https://code.launchpad.net/~corey.bryant/charm-helpers/image-instance/+merge/224170 > You are the owner of lp:~corey.bryant/charm-helpers/image-instance. >
-- Regards, Corey
« Back to merge proposal
I think we can probably use http_proxy instead. I'll give that a shot.
Thanks for the comment!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:32 PM, James Troup <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Is there any reason not to use $http_proxy (sic) rather than a /code.launchpad .net/~corey. bryant/ charm-helpers/ image-instance/ +merge/ 224170
> custom/Amulet specific variable name? $http_proxy is the de facto standard
> environment variable name.
> --
>
> https:/
> You are the owner of lp:~corey.bryant/charm-helpers/image-instance.
>
--
Regards,
Corey