LGTM with one trivial. Thanks for this, it's a monster diff -- let's throw it at CI and see what we've missed ;).
https://codereview.appspot.com/80280043/diff/140001/charm/url_test.go File charm/url_test.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/80280043/diff/140001/charm/url_test.go#newcode292 charm/url_test.go:292: c.Check(parsed, gc.DeepEquals, ref) add one for unmarshalling gibberish, just for safety's sake
https://codereview.appspot.com/80280043/
« Back to merge proposal
LGTM with one trivial. Thanks for this, it's a monster diff -- let's
throw it at CI and see what we've missed ;).
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/80280043/ diff/140001/ charm/url_ test.go
File charm/url_test.go (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/80280043/ diff/140001/ charm/url_ test.go# newcode292 test.go: 292: c.Check(parsed, gc.DeepEquals, ref)
charm/url_
add one for unmarshalling gibberish, just for safety's sake
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/80280043/