On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:04 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:01:54AM -0000, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Right.. we do need to stop it at some point... leaving it running means
> > the same libc problems and possible open files (it does write
> > to /var...) preventing unmounting filesystems cleanly.
>
> Yes, that much is true.
>
> > Would it then make sense to change this to stop on stopping portmap or
> > unmounted-nfs-filesystems and then emit that
> > in /etc/init.d/umountnfs.sh?
>
> That sounds reasonable to me, but I agree with you that this should be taken
> to a separate bug / branch.
>
> > Where would this leave an NFS root? Do we just leave rpc.statd running
> > in this case?
>
> Yes, in that case I think it has to stay running until the end.
>
> > I'll poke at that for a bit and see how it goes.
>
> Any progress on this? From the discussions on IRC I think we've got a
> pretty good handle now on the scope, so I'm keen to get this fixed up and
> merged.
>
I just picked this back up today. I am running a smoke test right now
and will push to the branch shortly.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:04 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: nfs-filesystems and then emit that d/umountnfs. sh?
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:01:54AM -0000, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Right.. we do need to stop it at some point... leaving it running means
> > the same libc problems and possible open files (it does write
> > to /var...) preventing unmounting filesystems cleanly.
>
> Yes, that much is true.
>
> > Would it then make sense to change this to stop on stopping portmap or
> > unmounted-
> > in /etc/init.
>
> That sounds reasonable to me, but I agree with you that this should be taken
> to a separate bug / branch.
>
> > Where would this leave an NFS root? Do we just leave rpc.statd running
> > in this case?
>
> Yes, in that case I think it has to stay running until the end.
>
> > I'll poke at that for a bit and see how it goes.
>
> Any progress on this? From the discussions on IRC I think we've got a
> pretty good handle now on the scope, so I'm keen to get this fixed up and
> merged.
>
I just picked this back up today. I am running a smoke test right now
and will push to the branch shortly.