It may be acceptable to make this BinaryPackageBuild.getPublishedSource, but it's certainly not BinaryPackagePublishingHistory.getPublishedSource -- it can return a publication in a totally different archive.
If you just want the source name, I'd expose BinaryPackageBuild.source_package_name instead.
It may be acceptable to make this BinaryPackageBu ild.getPublishe dSource, but it's certainly not BinaryPackagePu blishingHistory .getPublishedSo urce -- it can return a publication in a totally different archive.
If you just want the source name, I'd expose BinaryPackageBu ild.source_ package_ name instead.