Merge lp:~chmouel/testrepository/coverage-package-name into lp:~testrepository/testrepository/trunk
Proposed by
Chmouel Boudjnah
Status: | Rejected |
---|---|
Rejected by: | Robert Collins |
Proposed branch: | lp:~chmouel/testrepository/coverage-package-name |
Merge into: | lp:~testrepository/testrepository/trunk |
Diff against target: |
29 lines (+6/-0) 1 file modified
testrepository/setuptools_command.py (+6/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~chmouel/testrepository/coverage-package-name |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Robert Collins | Needs Fixing | ||
Marc Abramowitz (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email: mp+213218@code.launchpad.net |
To post a comment you must log in.
Unmerged revisions
- 241. By Chmouel Boudjnah
-
Add coverage package name
Allow to specify a different package name than the one from the setp.cfg
project.Fixes bug #1298398
+1. Just ran into this issue today with pbr (my own change request for pbr: https:/ /review. openstack. org/89205).
I can't decide whether I like your name for the option better ("coverage- package- name") or mine ("source"). Your seems clearer and more explicit, though mine matches the name of the option passed to coverage. I don't know. I could go either way.