I don't think it should go in its own directory, no -- unless it breaks anything like this? It's a lot more obvious that this is the client itself if it isn't essentially undistinguishable from library code when browsing.
Funny that you suggest cfg -> cfgFname and not lvl -> lvlFname. Updated both.
I don't think it should go in its own directory, no -- unless it breaks anything like this? It's a lot more obvious that this is the client itself if it isn't essentially undistinguishable from library code when browsing.
Funny that you suggest cfg -> cfgFname and not lvl -> lvlFname. Updated both.
Fixed import style.