How about using it as it is from snapcraft/storeapi as it is, instead of making a copy? that way we won't have to catchup the changes upstream.
Also if we have an example test case along with the merge then it will become convenient to test the base and other utility classes.
Otherwise LGTM
« Back to merge proposal
How about using it as it is from snapcraft/storeapi as it is, instead of making a copy? that way we won't have to catchup the changes upstream.
Also if we have an example test case along with the merge then it will become convenient to test the base and other utility classes.
Otherwise LGTM