> This doesn't make sense 3.0.0.0rc2 was never published anywhere, unless you're
> telling me that 3.0.0.1 from the stable PPA has different file layouts than
> the archive version, I'd suggest going with << 3.0.0.1
Yes, sorry, it was a bad idea :-/
The new version should be better! :)
> This doesn't make sense 3.0.0.0rc2 was never published anywhere, unless you're
> telling me that 3.0.0.1 from the stable PPA has different file layouts than
> the archive version, I'd suggest going with << 3.0.0.1
Yes, sorry, it was a bad idea :-/
The new version should be better! :)