Code review comment for ppa-dev-tools:fix-lp2038651-bionic-not-included
Revision history for this message
| Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
> supported_esm() currently also includes trusty and xenial. Should we test for
> those as well, or are you worried about the test becoming wrong once those
> become unsupported via esm?
Exactly, this is destined to bitrot but by ignoring those two I'm hoping to put that day off a few years. :-)
For purposes of the code, checking just one of them is going to be sufficient, and bionic will be around the longest of the three.