Martin Packman пишет:
> How about using properties returning 0 instead? This isn't a class designed for minimising memory usage, but as these values serve no purpose there seems no point storing them.
I followed the approach John used for st_dev and st_ino. I can do it
either way. But then should I change st_dev and st_ino implementations
as well?
Martin Packman пишет:
> How about using properties returning 0 instead? This isn't a class designed for minimising memory usage, but as these values serve no purpose there seems no point storing them.
I followed the approach John used for st_dev and st_ino. I can do it
either way. But then should I change st_dev and st_ino implementations
as well?
--
All the dude wanted was his rug back