On 2013/09/19 18:05:57, gary.poster wrote: > LGTM, thank you. I'll try QA now.
> I can't help but wish that we had some more descriptive name for this than > "Token". Hopefully we don't confuse ourselves with some semantic overlap in the > future.
QA good. thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/13627053/
« Back to merge proposal
On 2013/09/19 18:05:57, gary.poster wrote:
> LGTM, thank you. I'll try QA now.
> I can't help but wish that we had some more descriptive name for this
than
> "Token". Hopefully we don't confuse ourselves with some semantic
overlap in the
> future.
QA good. thanks!
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/13627053/