Code review comment for lp:~bcsaller/pyjuju/subordinate-ports

nesc, no, valuable, I think so. It has to be on the principal for this
to work the way its set up, recording it on the subordinate I think is
more clean that issuing commands to the subordinate and not seeing any
change in status for that service. The fact that the subordinate makes
a change somewhere else as well in status is more understandable than
not seeing it.

It might be possible to record the change in the sub and open it on
the principal but not record it there but that seemed like a recipe
for unintended consequences.

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
<email address hidden> wrote:
> is it nesc/valuable to record the open port against both the subordinate and the primary
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~bcsaller/juju/subordinate-ports/+merge/111534
> You are the owner of lp:~bcsaller/juju/subordinate-ports.