On 2014/05/08 10:43:00, wallyworld wrote:
> Thanks very much for picking this up. We need tests for the new api
calls and
> also possibly the new code in container_initialisation. So long as
it's been
> tested with lxc-use-clone set to true and false, LGTM
Added unit tests. I have run it live, doing it once more before landing.
On 2014/05/08 10:43:00, wallyworld wrote: initialisation. So long as
> Thanks very much for picking this up. We need tests for the new api
calls and
> also possibly the new code in container_
it's been
> tested with lxc-use-clone set to true and false, LGTM
Added unit tests. I have run it live, doing it once more before landing.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/96140044/ diff/1/ state/api/ provisioner/ provisioner. go provisioner/ provisioner. go (right):
> File state/api/
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/96140044/ diff/1/ state/api/ provisioner/ provisioner. go#newcode118 provisioner/ provisioner. go:118: func (st *State) rConfig( args params. ContainerManage rConfigParams) ContainerManage rConfig, err error) {
> state/api/
> ContainerManage
(result
> params.
> Need a doc comment
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/96140044/ diff/1/ state/apiserver /provisioner/ provisioner. go /provisioner/ provisioner. go (right):
> File state/apiserver
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/96140044/ diff/1/ state/apiserver /provisioner/ provisioner. go#newcode194 /provisioner/ provisioner. go:194: // rConfig
> state/apiserver
ContainerManage
> returns information from the environment config that are
> that is needed
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/96140044/