I'm concerned about this approach, because it would mean that people's configuration files might break when we add new official fields.
Is there some way that we could at least confine field names used for anchors to some kind of namespace?
« Back to merge proposal
I'm concerned about this approach, because it would mean that people's configuration files might break when we add new official fields.
Is there some way that we could at least confine field names used for anchors to some kind of namespace?