Code review comment for lp:~ara/mago/mago
Revision history for this message
| Ara Pulido (ara) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
> I would stick to mago just to have a short name. I think there are many
> projects whose name mean multiple things and that's not a problem.
>
I think libmago is short enough and it would be better for packaging in the future. If we create a package in the future, mago could be the source package providing as binaries: mago and libmago (and maybe magotests)