> > To be closer to std::(experimental::)optional. Looking at how we implemented
>
> mir optional_value is a different design to std::(experimental::)optional -
> making them look more alike is probably a bad idea.
Ok the difference between value() and -> in this proposal is odd. I will revert it to the original and update the usage for now.
> > To be closer to std::(experimen tal::)optional. Looking at how we implemented tal::)optional -
>
> mir optional_value is a different design to std::(experimen
> making them look more alike is probably a bad idea.
Ok the difference between value() and -> in this proposal is odd. I will revert it to the original and update the usage for now.