> I'd expand this to include this explanation you've got in the commit msg about > urlencode's requirement for a tuple. It just reads as a rant otherwise :)
Okay, but it *is* a rant. It's late/early here :)
Thanks for the review.
« Back to merge proposal
> I'd expand this to include this explanation you've got in the commit msg about
> urlencode's requirement for a tuple. It just reads as a rant otherwise :)
Okay, but it *is* a rant. It's late/early here :)
Thanks for the review.