> Looks good. I am going to approve this only because I assume that > previous code landed that I did not review, where this is no longer > needed? This used to be used in the interface updating service on the > rack controller.
Yep, r5074 on lp:maas changed that.
Thanks!
« Back to merge proposal
> Looks good. I am going to approve this only because I assume that
> previous code landed that I did not review, where this is no longer
> needed? This used to be used in the interface updating service on the
> rack controller.
Yep, r5074 on lp:maas changed that.
Thanks!