> I saw your mention of a "priority queue". I'm not sure we need that > sort of solution; we talked today about only querying the oldest 10 > (say) power statuses at a time. This will fit easily in the message > size.
I was using big words to mean just that :)
« Back to merge proposal
> I saw your mention of a "priority queue". I'm not sure we need that
> sort of solution; we talked today about only querying the oldest 10
> (say) power statuses at a time. This will fit easily in the message
> size.
I was using big words to mean just that :)