> Very good Alberto.
>
> I have re-assessed the comments and I only have two more points:
>
> 1) The WriteOrbMoms seems like a "bad" option name.
I agree. We can change that in 4.1 and propagate.
>
> 2) I can make a PR for clarifying H_so in sparse_matrices. I think having the
> classes and names of the variables to coincide with the type to be good
> (H_so_on_2D, H_so_off_2D) for instance?
Please go ahead. At some point I would like the offSO H to be a real array with the same
conventions as the rest, to clarify the code throughout.
> Very good Alberto.
>
> I have re-assessed the comments and I only have two more points:
>
> 1) The WriteOrbMoms seems like a "bad" option name.
I agree. We can change that in 4.1 and propagate.
>
> 2) I can make a PR for clarifying H_so in sparse_matrices. I think having the
> classes and names of the variables to coincide with the type to be good
> (H_so_on_2D, H_so_off_2D) for instance?
Please go ahead. At some point I would like the offSO H to be a real array with the same
conventions as the rest, to clarify the code throughout.