Code review comment for lp:~albertog/siesta/merge-OSSO

Revision history for this message
Alberto Garcia (albertog) wrote :

> Very good Alberto.
>
> I have re-assessed the comments and I only have two more points:
>
> 1) The WriteOrbMoms seems like a "bad" option name.

I agree. We can change that in 4.1 and propagate.

>
> 2) I can make a PR for clarifying H_so in sparse_matrices. I think having the
> classes and names of the variables to coincide with the type to be good
> (H_so_on_2D, H_so_off_2D) for instance?

Please go ahead. At some point I would like the offSO H to be a real array with the same
conventions as the rest, to clarify the code throughout.

« Back to merge proposal