Looks good to me!
1) You mention BSC may be "better" for GGA, I guess this means performance wise, no?
2) It is weird that forhar does not show any differences when using the "wrong" ordering? Why, it seems to suggest something is wrong! ? Or?
Lastly, a suggestion on the name of the XC.Use.BSC.CellXC name.
Could we perhaps make this more generalized so one can later use this to select distribution options?
I.e.
XC.Distribution BSC|GridXC
or something else?
As far as I understand the only difference is the distribution of mesh-points? Correct me if I am wrong.
Great job!
« Back to merge proposal
Looks good to me!
1) You mention BSC may be "better" for GGA, I guess this means performance wise, no?
2) It is weird that forhar does not show any differences when using the "wrong" ordering? Why, it seems to suggest something is wrong! ? Or?
Lastly, a suggestion on the name of the XC.Use.BSC.CellXC name.
Could we perhaps make this more generalized so one can later use this to select distribution options?
I.e.
XC.Distribution BSC|GridXC
or something else?
As far as I understand the only difference is the distribution of mesh-points? Correct me if I am wrong.
Great job!