Ok, looks fine to me
+ // We do this here, not in place_new_surface() so that clients get a resize event. + // This shouldn't be necessary, but works better with the gtk-mir backend. You consider this a gtk-mir bug? It smells like one to me
« Back to merge proposal
Ok, looks fine to me
+ // We do this here, not in place_new_surface() so that clients get a resize event.
+ // This shouldn't be necessary, but works better with the gtk-mir backend.
You consider this a gtk-mir bug? It smells like one to me