> 338 + catch (std::exception const&)
> ~~~
> Shouldn't that be catch(...)?
If we're seeing exceptions that are not derived from std::exception in the client API something is badly wrong. I think we should core and this gives us a decent chance of doing so.
> 338 + catch (std::exception const&)
> ~~~
> Shouldn't that be catch(...)?
If we're seeing exceptions that are not derived from std::exception in the client API something is badly wrong. I think we should core and this gives us a decent chance of doing so.