Code review comment for lp:~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-1415321

> You don't need to bump the SONAME of mirclient-debug-extension.
...
> I don't think you need to bump mirclient SONAME? The only loss I can see is
> the symbols exposed purely for the tests and PrivateProtobuf, neither of which
> are public. abi-compliance-checker will complain, but will be wrong in this
> case.

I thought that rewriting the symbol maps as I have would require the SONAME bump? As xxx@MIR_CLIENT_8 etc won't resolve?

Am I just wrong or is there an alternative incantation?