Thanks for tackling this and thanks for giving a good cover letter including the bug link - it makes it much easier to review.
I think this is a bit overspecific to the case of giving just one ignored file; if I said
bzr st foo~ bar~
and they were both ignored I would still find it strange if this just said nothing.
Now in the output format perhaps it is better not to give a warning but rather to show them under the heading 'ignored':
% bzr st foo~ bar~ ignored: foo~ bar~
that might be more adaptable to other presentations of the status output too.
hth
« Back to merge proposal
Thanks for tackling this and thanks for giving a good cover letter including the bug link - it makes it much easier to review.
I think this is a bit overspecific to the case of giving just one ignored file; if I said
bzr st foo~ bar~
and they were both ignored I would still find it strange if this just said nothing.
Now in the output format perhaps it is better not to give a warning but rather to show them under the heading 'ignored':
% bzr st foo~ bar~
ignored:
foo~
bar~
that might be more adaptable to other presentations of the status output too.
hth