Code review comment for ~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/squid:squid-4-merge
Revision history for this message
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
f33e652
(Get the code!)
1) I updated the refresh patterns, taking the more complete config from the squid-deb-proxy package. I left the caching of debs as a commented example, though, like it was before. I could be convinced otherwise. It would help to know why it was a comment in the first place, instead of enabled by default.
2) The attribution in d/NEWS.debian was added to a specific section in that file, namely under version "quid3 (3.5.6-1)". In that context, I think it's like a changelog entry, describing what happened at or around that version, so it makes sense to keep it. What do you think?
3) dropped
4) dropped