I also did a review of LP: #2024663 and did a cursory check of the packaging changes and all LGTM as well. Notably I agree this seems low risk since it's addressing a potential corner cases for kinetic users which is unlikely to be hit, but worth cleanup in case jammy or focal get backports of this.
Based on Michal's comment, setting to Approved.
I also did a review of LP: #2024663 and did a cursory check of the packaging changes and all LGTM as well. Notably I agree this seems low risk since it's addressing a potential corner cases for kinetic users which is unlikely to be hit, but worth cleanup in case jammy or focal get backports of this.