* Changelog:
- [-] old content and logical tag match as expected
- [√] changelog entry correct version and targeted codename
- [√] changelog entries correct
- [√] update-maintainer has been run
* Actual changes:
- [-] no upstream changes to consider
- [-] no further upstream version to consider
- [√] debian changes look safe
* Old Delta:
- [-] dropped changes are ok to be dropped
- [-] nothing else to drop
- [√] changes forwarded upstream/debian (if appropriate)
* New Delta:
- [√] no new patches added
- [-] patches match what was proposed upstream
- [-] patches correctly included in debian/patches/series
- [-] patches have correct DEP3 metadata
* Build/Test:
- [√] build is ok
- [√] verified PPA package installs/uninstalls
+ But see discussion below
- [√] autopkgtest against the PPA package passes
+ Skip in lxc; see below
- [-] sanity checks test fine
Installing sasl2-bin results in some man pages installed to /usr/share/man/man8 and /usr/share/man/man1 that appear to match the bins installed by the package. The man pages display fine and are formatted correctly.
I was also able to install cyrus-sasl2-doc. As expected it's missing a lot of stuff, but the top level framework skeleton is there:
Of course, the links in these html files are largely broken. What I'm wondering is if it might be better to make the cyrus-sasl2-doc binary package uninstallable?
I also ran the autopkgtests but they did not seem to do anything interesting in my lxc container. At least, it seems not to care about the missing docs:
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: testing package cyrus-sasl2 version 2.1.27+dfsg-2ubuntu1~ppa1
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: build not needed
* SKIP no tests in this package
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
* SKIP no tests in this package
Anyway, apart from the question on the docs package installability everything else looks fine to go in.
* Changelog:
- [-] old content and logical tag match as expected
- [√] changelog entry correct version and targeted codename
- [√] changelog entries correct
- [√] update-maintainer has been run
* Actual changes:
- [-] no upstream changes to consider
- [-] no further upstream version to consider
- [√] debian changes look safe
* Old Delta:
- [-] dropped changes are ok to be dropped
- [-] nothing else to drop
- [√] changes forwarded upstream/debian (if appropriate)
* New Delta: patches/ series
- [√] no new patches added
- [-] patches match what was proposed upstream
- [-] patches correctly included in debian/
- [-] patches have correct DEP3 metadata
* Build/Test:
- [√] build is ok
- [√] verified PPA package installs/uninstalls
+ But see discussion below
- [√] autopkgtest against the PPA package passes
+ Skip in lxc; see below
- [-] sanity checks test fine
Installing sasl2-bin results in some man pages installed to /usr/share/man/man8 and /usr/share/man/man1 that appear to match the bins installed by the package. The man pages display fine and are formatted correctly.
I was also able to install cyrus-sasl2-doc. As expected it's missing a lot of stuff, but the top level framework skeleton is there:
$ dpkg -L cyrus-sasl2-doc doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ LDAP_SASLAUTHD. gz doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ NEWS.Debian. gz doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ changelog. Debian. gz doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ copyright doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ developer. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ download. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ genindex. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ getsasl. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ index.html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ operations. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ packager. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ search. html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ setup.html doc/cyrus- sasl2-doc/ support. html doc-base/ cyrus-sasl2- doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/
/usr/share/doc-base
/usr/share/
Of course, the links in these html files are largely broken. What I'm wondering is if it might be better to make the cyrus-sasl2-doc binary package uninstallable?
I also ran the autopkgtests but they did not seem to do anything interesting in my lxc container. At least, it seems not to care about the missing docs:
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: testing package cyrus-sasl2 version 2.1.27+ dfsg-2ubuntu1~ ppa1 @@@@@@@ @@@@@@ summary
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: build not needed
* SKIP no tests in this package
autopkgtest [01:08:35]: @@@@@@@
* SKIP no tests in this package
Anyway, apart from the question on the docs package installability everything else looks fine to go in.