Code review comment for lp:~acoconut/systers/flexible_essays

Revision history for this message
Ana Cutillas (acoconut) wrote :

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Robin J <email address hidden> wrote:

> Review: Needs Fixing
>
> I would move the comment "added to support subscribe essays" up to the if
> statement, as right now it looks like just that one line was added for the
> essays.
>

OK, done.

>
> I would also suggest that you mark lines that are just for your debugging
> with a comment like "debugging" so that a) I can tell that's what they are,
> and b) you can find them to remove them later. I assume lines 53, 55-57
> are debugging statements?
>

Line 53 is not mine and it looks to me that when somebody is logging
through syslog for debugging, they write to the info file, in this line
they're writing to the error log, so maybe they wanted to keep a log of
this error every time it happens? I can add the if DEBUG_MODE statement if
you think it shouldn't be always stored. Let me know.

55-57 was junk, I got rid of it.

> Why is replacements['<mm-essay-box>'] always ''? Shouldn't you just get
> rid of it?
>

Yes, we're not using the replacements['mm-essay-box'] anymore, this might
mean some cleaning up is due in all the template related files. I'll leave
this for the end when I do the cleaning up.

> In subscribe.py you should make sure that the essay variable that is
> passed in is the same type (a list?) whether there is just one question or
> many (I can't see where you construct that data structure -- where does
> that happen?)
>
> (in subscribe.py) It seems pretty dangerous to have the question label
> just be the order in which you process the questions. Python does not
> guarantee that in a loop that says
>
> for foo in foo_list:
>
> that you will process each foo in the same order every time. Also, what
> happens if I reorder these questions (you don't have that functionality
> yet, but you need it)? Do you want them to have different question
> numbers? I think you want the question name (like 'talk') here.
>

Mmm... are you suggesting using the question name as the question ID? That
would work.

>
> You also seem to have hard coded the version to 1. Why is that?
>
> In DlistUtils.py, the FormQuestion class, why are you putting together
> that command statement, that seems just to put something in the info log,
> when your next statement does it more directly? That confused me for quite
> a while.
>

I know, it confused me too, but it's what every other class does! So I
thought it was something you guys had agreed on?

> If form_question_id is autoupdating, then what are you doing in line 144?
>

Line 144 is not mine or close to mine, I wrote around the 300 lines.

>
>
> In DlistUtils.py, where did you add remove_dlist() I don't see it.
>

I haven't done anything about removing dlists. Had we talk about something
like that?

From your other email:

2. version ought to be stored with the question. You would update the
> version whenever someone edits the question rather than replaces it (I
> would think an edit would be one of several types
> -wording change
> - answer type
>
> So I would start when someone creates a question as version 1, and then
> when it is edited, that gets incremented. So it's part of the definition
> of the question (like the question text), and you don't need to store it in
> the pck file (every question could be a different version level.).

Alright that's pretty easy.

> I think the big reason you don't understand version yet is that you
> haven't figured out what you are going to do with it. If you were to
> sketch out what the UI is going to look like for the administrator, when
> they go to approve these folks, and then think about what you want it to
> look like if you have two people with a) different versions of the same
> question, b) different questions, that might help you figure out where you
> want to keep the version number.

> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~acoconut/systers/flexible_essays/+merge/116732
> You are the owner of lp:~acoconut/systers/flexible_essays.
>

« Back to merge proposal