Code review comment for lp:~ack/landscape-client/fix-package-rules

+1

From IRC:

<free> ack: you didn't point the APT sources to xenial altogher right? just
       added to the stock the single repo with new client [11:28]
<free> to stock wily
<ack> free, yes [11:31]
<free> ack: ok
<ack> free, I wanted to test in isolation
<free> ack: makes sense
<sparkiegeek> ack: +1'd - that's what I expected to see [11:32]
<free> ack: I think it's a good enough test for landing the branch, but of
       course someone will need to also test the real thing: wily->xenial and
       trusty->xenial. I'm reasonably confident there won't be issues.