This doesn’t work here on my device: I’ve installed packages built from this branch (which pulled in oxide), and running a webapp that has version 1.0 of the policy fails, I’m seeing this in the log:
Using Oxide as the web engine backend
and then:
LaunchProcess: failed to execvp:
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/oxide-qt/chrome-sandbox
QFile::exists() is probably not good enough to check access rights.
I have tried the following:
which is closer to your original solution, but I’m still getting the same issue. Could it be that version 1.0 of the policy doesn’t prevent from reading this file? Can you check with Jamie?
This doesn’t work here on my device: I’ve installed packages built from this branch (which pulled in oxide), and running a webapp that has version 1.0 of the policy fails, I’m seeing this in the log:
Using Oxide as the web engine backend
and then:
LaunchProcess: failed to execvp: lib/arm- linux-gnueabihf /oxide- qt/chrome- sandbox
/usr/
QFile::exists() is probably not good enough to check access rights.
I have tried the following:
return QFile(oxideHint Location) .open(QIODevice ::ReadOnly) ;
which is closer to your original solution, but I’m still getting the same issue. Could it be that version 1.0 of the policy doesn’t prevent from reading this file? Can you check with Jamie?