> would it be better if I used a synchronised Qt.createQmlObject('<with
> source>') instead
> to remove the Loader bit?
This looks like a good compromise: it allows the extension to live in the QML word, and doesn't suggest that we want the extension to return something visible.
> would it be better if I used a synchronised Qt.createQmlObj ect('<with
> source>') instead
> to remove the Loader bit?
This looks like a good compromise: it allows the extension to live in the QML word, and doesn't suggest that we want the extension to return something visible.