three point
1. wouldn't it make sense to either depreciate in-/exclude or in/exclude-globbing as they afre functional identical
2. not sure if we should want to have keep the old non-globbing selection for simple setups. easier to understand and done.
3. your branch clashes with the current dev branch. you probably need to rebase your changes.
..ede/duply.net
« Back to merge proposal
three point
1. wouldn't it make sense to either depreciate in-/exclude or in/exclude-globbing as they afre functional identical
2. not sure if we should want to have keep the old non-globbing selection for simple setups. easier to understand and done.
3. your branch clashes with the current dev branch. you probably need to rebase your changes.
..ede/duply.net