> Note that providing a fallback image is optional for the scope. So, if the
> scope hasn't specified a fallback, the shell should probably provide some
> generic fallback image as a last resort.
I didn't see that in the bug, that means involving design to give us a fits-all-cases "broken" image that i can see being hard to design.
Honestly i thought by reading the bug that if no fallback is used we'd just get what we have now, i.e. no image at all.
> Note that providing a fallback image is optional for the scope. So, if the
> scope hasn't specified a fallback, the shell should probably provide some
> generic fallback image as a last resort.
I didn't see that in the bug, that means involving design to give us a fits-all-cases "broken" image that i can see being hard to design.
Honestly i thought by reading the bug that if no fallback is used we'd just get what we have now, i.e. no image at all.