bzr-svn incompatible with bzr 2.4 or higher
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bzr-svn (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Jelmer Vernooij | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: bzr-svn
When I'm about to upgrade bzr to the last version in oneiric (2.4.0~
Watching to bzr-svn depends field:
Depends: bzr (>= 2.0~), bzr (<< 2.4~), python (>= 2.5), python-central (>= 0.6.11), python-subvertpy (>= 0.6.1~)
it seems like bzr-svn doesn't like any bzr 2.4 version or higher. Is this a real bzr-svn compatibility problem with those high versions or just a mistake in the field? Thanks!
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: bzr-svn 1.0.4+bzr3475-1
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.39-3-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu May 26 17:10:19 2011
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
PackageArchitec
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: bzr-svn
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
| shankao (shankao) wrote | #1 |
| summary: |
- bzr-svn incompatible with bzr 2.4 + bzr-svn incompatible with bzr 2.4 or higher |
| Changed in bzr-svn (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → In Progress |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| assignee: | nobody → Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) |
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in bzr-svn (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
This bug was fixed in the package bzr-svn - 1.1.0~bzr3767-1
---------------
bzr-svn (1.1.0~bzr3767-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Run testsuite as part of the build.
* New upstream snapshot.
+ Now requires subvertpy >= 0.8.0.
+ Compatible with bzr 2.4. LP: #788533, Closes: #601307, #629785, #628973
+ Adds support for revision argument to WorkingTree.
* Support running the test suite in parallel.
* Use dh_python2. Closes: #616767
* Switch to debhelper 7, drop cdbs.
* Add build dependency on python-bzrlib.tests for newer versions of bzr.
* Bump standards version to 3.9.2 (no changes).
* Make python-tdb a build dependency so the relevant test can be run.
-- Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden> Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:58:02 +0000