Versions of libbfd does not match the content of binutils.shlibs
Bug #452526 reported by
Fabrice Coutadeur
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| binutils (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Matthias Klose | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: binutils
Hi,
I was trying to build oprofile, and it fails with the following error:
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/
I've been investigating, and it seems that the soname of libbfd (2.19.92.20091014) does not match the content of the shlibs file:
more /var/lib/
libbfd 2.19.91.20091014 binutils
libopcodes 2.19.91.20091014 binutils
It happens the same with libopcodes
Related branches
| Changed in binutils (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| Changed in binutils (Ubuntu): | |
| assignee: | nobody → Matthias Klose (doko) |
| milestone: | none → ubuntu-9.10 |
| status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Revision history for this message
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in binutils (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.20-0ubuntu1
---------------
binutils (2.20-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* binutils 2.20 final release.
- Fix PR binutils/10785, memory corruptions.
- gold updates. LP: #453278.
* debian/*.shlibs: Update to the release version. LP: #452526.
* Fix build failure on arm, building from the release tarball.
-- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:14:00 +0200