System Monitor shows unfriendly name "update-notifier"

Bug #399591 reported by Vish
38
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
One Hundred Papercuts
Triaged
Low
Unassigned
update-notifier (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: update-notifier

I suggest renaming the update-notifier > update-manager daemon .
Since its now working just as an update manger daemon, and there is *no other specific notification*, which existed earlier.

This would ease the discomfort that several users have complained in Bug #332945 , saying the new pop-under is a security threat.

The main source of the discomfort is because the daemon is labeled different from the app it opens.
Renaming it would make it more up-to date with the present designed behavior for updates.

Related branches

Vish (vish)
description: updated
description: updated
Vish (vish)
description: updated
summary: - Rename Update notifier daemon > update-manager daemon
+ Rename Update-notifier > update-manager-daemon
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Vish (vish) wrote : Re: Rename Update-notifier > update-manager-daemon

assigning to mpt , after discussion in irc...
Kindly consider , merging the notifier into the new update-manager.

Changed in update-notifier (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
importance: Undecided → Low
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
assignee: nobody → Mohamed Amine IL Idrissi (ilidrissi.amine)
status: Triaged → In Progress
Changed in update-notifier (Ubuntu):
assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) → Mohamed Amine IL Idrissi (ilidrissi.amine)
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

In <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdateHandling> I propose renaming "Update Manager" to "Software Updater" (on the grounds that it's more informative). If that happens, it might make more sense to have software-updater-daemon.

Changed in hundredpapercuts:
milestone: none → precise-7-system-administration
summary: - Rename Update-notifier > update-manager-daemon
+ Rename Update-notifier > software-updater-daemon
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
assignee: Mohamed Amine Ilidrissi (ilidrissi.amine) → nobody
Changed in update-notifier (Ubuntu):
assignee: Mohamed Amine Ilidrissi (ilidrissi.amine) → nobody
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
status: In Progress → Triaged
Changed in update-notifier (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Confirmed
Changed in hundredpapercuts:
milestone: precise-7-system-administration → quantal-8-administration
Revision history for this message
Michael Terry (mterry) wrote : Re: Rename Update-notifier > software-updater-daemon

Does the phrase "update-notifier" actually appear to the user? If not, I don't see a need to rename the package.

Revision history for this message
Timothy Arceri (t-fridey) wrote :

Hi Michael,
                   The phrase "update-notifier" appears to the user in the System Monitor (see attached screenshot).

Revision history for this message
Michael Terry (mterry) wrote :

This won't require any source or binary renaming. It just needs a .desktop file with a nice user string in it that matches the binary, as far as I can tell.

summary: - Rename Update-notifier > software-updater-daemon
+ System Monitor shows unfriendly name for update-notifier
summary: - System Monitor shows unfriendly name for update-notifier
+ System Monitor shows unfriendly name "update-notifier"
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

update-notifier does more than just notify you of updates. It also watches for .crash files in /var/crash, cups printer drivers, disks with debian packages, and local avahi connections among other things. I don't think it makes sense to rename update-notifier to update-manager-daemon.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

As I understand it, most of those tasks are to be converted to Upstart jobs.

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

Yes, that's true and most of them have been, however they are still part of this package.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.