Ubuntu
easystroke package

Please upgrade easystroke to version 0.3.98.1

Bug #318051 reported by Tom Jaeger
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
easystroke (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: easystroke

easystroke (0.3.98.1-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  * New upstream beta

 -- Thomas Jaeger <email address hidden> Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:31:54 -0500

---

This is a beta version, a proper release will follow within the next month. Major internal changes were needed to support the upcoming 1.6 X server. Some of the advanced features might not work correctly at this point, due to X server issues. For fully correct operation, easystroke requires the following patches in the X server (on top of server-1.6-branch). They're all nominated for inclusion into 1.6.

488d45295105daf10ccd17ca93ae6a6f4d0104f1 dix: EnqueueEvent and PlayReleasedEvent need to handle DeviceMotionNotifies
a85f0d6b98237d8a196de624207acf1983a1859a Xi: fix use of button->down - bitflags instead of int arrays.
b2756a71a432f7cf7c870a48676c98625512558d Xext: Send out correct events in ProcXTestFakeInput
3d549438c29004d78032ecc50ab45ca0e3f49623 Don't alter device button maps in DoSetPointerMapping
d645721170b1196e5064b397cfbffd1da8c79bb1 mi: ensure chained button mappings from SD -> MD (#19282)
f7f85f696570541e2dd43462675de9e6ee46f545 Count the number of logically down buttons in buttonsDown

The tarball that the diff.gz is against can be found here:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/thjaeger/ubuntu/pool/main/e/easystroke/easystroke_0.3.98.1.orig.tar.gz

Related branches

lp:ubuntu/karmic/easystroke
Revision history for this message
Tom Jaeger (thjaeger) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Tom Jaeger (thjaeger) wrote :
Revision history for this message
James Westby (james-w) wrote :

Uploaded, thank you.

I added a bit more to the changelog so that it was clear what changes were
introduced.

I'm interested in why you desired lzma compression for this package?

Thanks,

James

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package easystroke - 0.3.98.1-0ubuntu1

---------------
easystroke (0.3.98.1-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  * New upstream beta (LP: #318051)
  * Use lzma compression in the deb.
    - pass -Z lzma to dh_builddeb
    - Pre-Depend on dpkg (>= 1.14.12ubuntu3)
  * Build-Depend on intltool for the i18n of the desktop file.

 -- Thomas Jaeger <email address hidden> Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:31:54 -0500

Changed in easystroke:
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Tom Jaeger (thjaeger) wrote : Re: [Bug 318051] Re: Please upgrade easystroke to version 0.3.98.1

James Westby wrote:
> Uploaded, thank you.
>
> I added a bit more to the changelog so that it was clear what changes were
> introduced.
 Thank you. There'll be another upload in a couple weeks, should I open
a new bug for that or reuse this one?

> I'm interested in why you desired lzma compression for this package?
Oh, the reason is that I also upload .deb packages to sourceforge for
users to download, and for some reason, package size matters to some
people, and the executable is already pretty large due to heavy template
use. I meant to revert to default compression for the ubuntu package,
but of course I forgot. I guess it doesn't really make a difference in
the end.

Thanks,
Tom

Revision history for this message
James Westby (james-w) wrote :

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 03:23 +0000, Tom Jaeger wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > Uploaded, thank you.
> >
> > I added a bit more to the changelog so that it was clear what changes were
> > introduced.
> Thank you. There'll be another upload in a couple weeks, should I open
> a new bug for that or reuse this one?

Please open a new bug.

> > I'm interested in why you desired lzma compression for this package?
> Oh, the reason is that I also upload .deb packages to sourceforge for
> users to download, and for some reason, package size matters to some
> people, and the executable is already pretty large due to heavy template
> use. I meant to revert to default compression for the ubuntu package,
> but of course I forgot. I guess it doesn't really make a difference in
> the end.

It's just unusual in packages in Ubuntu, that's why I asked, there's no
real problem with it.

Thanks,

James

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.