ia32 configury

I've submitted the attached patch upstream to address this. Note that this still requires manually fiddling with the string, because we need the *EFI* arch name here which is ia32, not i386.

This bug was fixed in the package sbsigntool - 0.6-0ubuntu4

---------------
sbsigntool (0.6-0ubuntu4) saucy; urgency=low

  * debian/patches/efi_arch_ia32.patch: Use AC_CANONICAL_HOST, not uname -m,
    to determine target. Closes LP: #1066038.
  * debian/patches/Align-signature-data-to-8-bytes.patch: Align signature
    data to 8 bytes. This matches the Microsoft signing implementation,
    which enables us to use sbattach to verify the integrity of the binaries
    returned by the SysDev signing service.
  * debian/patches/update_checksums.patch: make sure we update the PE checksum
    field as well, also needed for matching the Microsoft signing
    implementation.
  * debian/patches/fix-signature-padding.patch: fix calculation of the
    size of our signature data, so that we don't write out extra zeroes
    when we detach a signature.
 -- Steve Langasek <email address hidden> Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:07:17 -0700

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted sbsigntool into raring-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/0.6-0ubuntu4~13.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted sbsigntool into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/0.6-0ubuntu4~12.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted sbsigntool into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/0.6-0ubuntu4~12.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

This bug was fixed in the package sbsigntool - 0.6-0ubuntu4~13.04.1

---------------
sbsigntool (0.6-0ubuntu4~13.04.1) raring; urgency=low

  * Backport to update SecureBoot support. LP: #1229572.

sbsigntool (0.6-0ubuntu4) saucy; urgency=low

  * debian/patches/efi_arch_ia32.patch: Use AC_CANONICAL_HOST, not uname -m,
    to determine target. Closes LP: #1066038.
  * debian/patches/Align-signature-data-to-8-bytes.patch: Align signature
    data to 8 bytes. This matches the Microsoft signing implementation,
    which enables us to use sbattach to verify the integrity of the binaries
    returned by the SysDev signing service.
  * debian/patches/update_checksums.patch: make sure we update the PE checksum
    field as well, also needed for matching the Microsoft signing
    implementation.
  * debian/patches/fix-signature-padding.patch: fix calculation of the
    size of our signature data, so that we don't write out extra zeroes
    when we detach a signature.

sbsigntool (0.6-0ubuntu3) saucy; urgency=low

  * Build-depend on gcc-multilib to support building the test suite.
 -- Steve Langasek <email address hidden> Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:35:28 -0700