If you mean that tests/11-scale-elastic.py fails, that would be a good thing IMO, as we updated our branch here to explicitly deny requests to :9200 on the kibana unit (as it's basically giving anyone with access to :80 on the kibana unit write access to the ES cluster).
If you mean that tests/11- scale-elastic. py fails, that would be a good thing IMO, as we updated our branch here to explicitly deny requests to :9200 on the kibana unit (as it's basically giving anyone with access to :80 on the kibana unit write access to the ES cluster).
Anyway, I've re-merged upstream, and updated 11-scale-elastic.py so it doesn't expect to be able to use :9200 on the kibana unit externally, in our kibana4 branch here: /code.launchpad .net/~canonical -is-sa/ charms/ trusty/ kibana/ kibana4/ +merge/ 276944
https:/
I think this MP should be marked superseded. Michael F?