Merge ~zioproto/ubuntu/+source/neutron:stable/liberty into ~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/neutron:stable/liberty
| Status: | Needs review |
|---|---|
| Proposed branch: | ~zioproto/ubuntu/+source/neutron:stable/liberty |
| Merge into: | ~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/neutron:stable/liberty |
| Diff against target: |
112 lines (+90/-0) 3 files modified
debian/changelog (+7/-0) debian/patches/ns-exists-before-get-devices.patch (+82/-0) debian/patches/series (+1/-0) |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Bryant | 2016-10-27 | Pending | |
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the Change
| Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote : | # |
| Saverio Proto (zioproto) wrote : | # |
Hello,
I believe the bug is there also in master, but I cannot test it
because I dont have a production environment newer than Liberty. Maybe
you guys at Canonical can help sorting this out ?
The patch I proposed to merge on Ubuntu packages is what I really run
in production and I consider stable.
The patch based in review 309050 patchset 24 improves the previous
patch with a try catch block, to fix a race condition in case the
cronjob is running exactly when the code is running. It is really a
corner case of the corner case, I did not try that patchset in
production.
Both patches are valuable to improve the stability of Neutron.
I would really like the Liberty packages patched with this merge
request, and somebody to help me to make this patch upstream and
backported at least to Newton.
Thanks for your help.
Saverio
2016-10-31 18:06 GMT+01:00 Corey Bryant <email address hidden>:
> Hi Saverio,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Do you know how this is fixed, or why it doesn't exist, in Mitaka and above?
>
> I reviewed your latest upstream patch proposal at https:/
>
> Thanks,
> Corey
>
>
> --
> https:/
> You are the owner of ~zioproto/
| Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote : | # |
Saverio, Can you try to get your latest patches landed upstream in master via https:/
Once it lands in master, we can get them backported to upstream stable/newton and stable/mitaka branches. Then we (canonical folks) can help sort the Ubuntu/
Thanks,
Corey
| Saverio Proto (zioproto) wrote : | # |
Hello,
the upstream patch is merged. I just pushed a refreshed commit in my tree, and this merge request got automatically updated.
thank you
Unmerged commits
- 0986932... by Saverio Proto <email address hidden> on 2016-10-27


Hi Saverio,
Thanks for the patch.
Do you know how this is fixed, or why it doesn't exist, in Mitaka and above?
I reviewed your latest upstream patch proposal at https:/ /review. openstack. org/#/c/ 309050/ 24 and it seemed like a reasonable approach. Can you explain why you've gone with the approach in this merge proposal vs what you had in that upstream review?
Thanks,
Corey