> > Kevin,
> >
> > I am not sure what do you mean by "not random" enough.
> >
> > I am using sysbench 0.5 with new zipf distribution.
> >
> > In anycase I do not expect a performance degradation when I use bigger
> cache,
> > but
> > this is what I see.
>
> Vadim,
>
> I see.
> I will test in sysbench 0.5 with zipf.
> And improve the row cache.
>
> thanks.
Hi Vadim,
Can you provide the command which you use to test the row cache with sysbench?
> > Kevin,
> >
> > I am not sure what do you mean by "not random" enough.
> >
> > I am using sysbench 0.5 with new zipf distribution.
> >
> > In anycase I do not expect a performance degradation when I use bigger
> cache,
> > but
> > this is what I see.
>
> Vadim,
>
> I see.
> I will test in sysbench 0.5 with zipf.
> And improve the row cache.
>
> thanks.
Hi Vadim,
Can you provide the command which you use to test the row cache with sysbench?
tks.