Merge lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7_atomic_load_fix into lp:gcc-linaro/4.7

Proposed by Yvan Roux
Status: Rejected
Rejected by: Yvan Roux
Proposed branch: lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7_atomic_load_fix
Merge into: lp:gcc-linaro/4.7
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7_atomic_load_fix
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Yvan Roux Disapprove
Christophe Lyon Needs Information
Review via email: mp+140610@code.launchpad.net

Description of the change

Fix LP 1084010

Backport PR 55492 fix from mainline.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :

cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r115041 and queued it for build.

The diff against the ancestor r115040 is available at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix.diff

and will be built on the following builders:
 a9-builder a9hf-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64 xaarch64 xaarch64_bare xcortexa15hf

You can track the build queue at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/scheduler

cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr115040
cbuild-state: check

Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

Patch committed matches upstream.

Testsuite is still running, and it looks like we also have to wait for the results of the ancestor to be regenerated to see if there are some regressions.

review: Needs Information
Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

Some results are ready:
* no diff on xaarch64r1, xaarch64_barer1, x86_64r1
* on i686, 2 new PASS (vs 1 UNRESOLVED and 1 FAIL), in:
  +PASS: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
   +PASS: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o link, -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin

looks unrelated, and unexpected though.

* on xcortexa16hfr1, some failures in 30_threads, probably caused by qemu

* cortexa9 and cortexa9hf results still pending.

Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :

cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-precise-cbuild445-oort3-xcortexa15hfr1.

The build results are available at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild445-oort3-xcortexa15hfr1

-PASS: 30_threads/lock/2.cc execution test
+FAIL: 30_threads/lock/2.cc execution test
-PASS: 30_threads/shared_future/members/wait.cc execution test
+FAIL: 30_threads/shared_future/members/wait.cc execution test
+WARNING: program timed out.
+WARNING: program timed out.
+WARNING: program timed out.

The full diff is at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild445-oort3-xcortexa15hfr1/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild445-oort3-xcortexa15hfr1/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: x86_64-precise-cbuild445-oort3-xcortexa15hfr1

Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :

cbuild successfully built this on i686-precise-cbuild445-oort4-i686r1.

The build results are available at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/i686-precise-cbuild445-oort4-i686r1

-UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
+PASS: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o execute -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
-FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o link, -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
+PASS: g++.dg/lto/20090112 cp_lto_20090112_0.o-cp_lto_20090112_0.o link, -O0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin

The full diff is at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/i686-precise-cbuild445-oort4-i686r1/testsuite-diff.txt

The full testsuite results are at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115041~yvan-roux~4.7_atomic_load_fix/logs/i686-precise-cbuild445-oort4-i686r1/gcc-testsuite.txt

cbuild-checked: i686-precise-cbuild445-oort4-i686r1

Revision history for this message
Yvan Roux (yvan-roux) wrote :

* Obsoleted as it will be include in the January merge:
  https://code.launchpad.net/~matthew-gretton-dann/gcc-linaro/4.7-jan13-merge/+merge/141614

review: Disapprove

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches