Merge lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7-2013.08-merge into lp:gcc-linaro/4.7

Proposed by Yvan Roux
Status: Merged
Approved by: Christophe Lyon
Approved revision: no longer in the source branch.
Merge reported by: Yvan Roux
Merged at revision: not available
Proposed branch: lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7-2013.08-merge
Merge into: lp:gcc-linaro/4.7
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp:~yvan-roux/gcc-linaro/4.7-2013.08-merge
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Christophe Lyon Approve
Review via email: mp+179681@code.launchpad.net

Description of the change

merge at rev. 201653

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote :

cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r115080 and queued it for build.

The diff against the ancestor r115079 is available at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115080~yvan-roux~4.7-2013.08-merge.diff

and will be built on the following builders:
 a9-builder a9hf-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64 xaarch64 xaarch64_bare xcortexa15hf

You can track the build queue at:
 http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/helpers/scheduler

cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115080~yvan-roux~4.7-2013.08-merge
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro/4.7+bzr115079
cbuild-state: check

Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

One new failure appears on a9/a9hf/xcortexa15 and aarch64 targets:
+FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nullptr.C -std=c++11 execution test

i686 and x86_64 are clean.

armv5 is still running.

review: Needs Information
Revision history for this message
Yvan Roux (yvan-roux) wrote :

I think we can go with the new failure, as it is not a regression but a failure in a new added testcase.

Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

Agreed for the new failure.

The diff matches the svn diff, but your ChangeLog.linaro entry should mention revision 201655 instead of 201653.

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

Still waiting for armv5 results.

Revision history for this message
Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) wrote :

armv5 is clean.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches